Why Feminists Are Ugly

by Frost on June 4, 2012

In recent decades, Feminists have been riding high, tearing down the institutions and social fabric of the western world. They have conquered our courts, bolshevized our bureaucracy, and power-drill fucked our pop culture until all that remains is a quivering, whimpering heap of ultradiversity and hamster-crack.

The enemies of Feminism are legion though, as the creed has shattered many lives, and rendered the world a darker, weaker, and lonelier place. The enemies of feminism are wise, the enemies of feminism are disciplined, and the enemies of feminism are right. Still, they have been on the losing end of this battle for a century.

Hercules was stronger than Medusa, but he could not slay her on his own. Medusa was so ugly, so vile, so repulsive, that not even a Demigod could gaze into her eyes without turning to stone.

As with Hercules, so it is for the anti-feminists. To gaze into the eyes of Feminism, to see it for what it is, is to feel your heart turn to stone. But To understand Feminism, to see it for what it truly is, we must gaze into her eyes without flinching.

This Is What A Feminist Looks Like

So let’s begin with some historical perspective. Feminism is a branch of Marxist-Leninism, the most vile and destructive ideology that mankind has ever known. See here and here, if you need convincing.

But why is the history of Feminism so closely entwined with that of Marxism? What do female empowerment and class warfare have in common? What the hell is Marxism, anyways?

These are big questions. That last one is the biggest, and I won’t try to answer it now. But here are some of the core beliefs that Marxists adhere to:

- Marxists believe that the bourgeoisie capitalist elite is oppressing the workers and that private property is an institution that perpetuates class divisions.

- Marxists believe that the great powers were oppressing their colonies and retarding their growth with their authoritarian, imperialist governments.

- Marxists believe that all private property is theft, and that productive assets should be liquidated and handed over to the workers.

Note the common theme among all of these beliefs: If true, they justify a redistribution of the present allocation of assets and political power. Marxism is the original Rationalization Hamster, the historical tool of men who would rather take from others than build on their own. It is broader than Marx, it is more powerful than the Comintern, it is older than Gracchus, and it lives and breathes today in the rapidly-decaying postwar western democracies.

Modern feminism, to mix the Herculean metaphor, is but one head of this Hydra.

*

To destroy Feminism, or Marxism, we must aim for its heart. Otherwise, we’re just spraying the extinguisher at the top of the flame.

Where is the heart of Marxism? What is the source of its energy and organization?

Marxism is able to attract smart and ambitious followers because it has money and power to offer them. Obeying the law and working for a living is no fun. Organizing a revolutionary movement? Hey, now we’re talking! Remember, we’ve got to redistribute those resources to somebody.

But what is the heart of Feminism?

True, there is some economic redistribution going on through family law courts, welfare, equal pay laws, and so on. But its a drop in the bucket compared to the cash cows of Climate Change, Diversity Inc, and wars to bring Democracy to our little brown brothers.

So what’s going on?

Steve Sailer provides a hint with Sailer’s Law Of Female Journalism:

“The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.”

Substitute “Feminist” for “Female Journalist” and we arrive at a more general definition:

Feminism is the set of ideologies whose aim is to redistribute the natural allocation of access to desirable men. It is Marxism in the Sexual, rather than Economic Marketplace.

The ultimate goal of the Feminist is to create a world in which all women are as hideous and awful and dead inside as they are, so that everyone can have an equal timeshare in the alpha harems, and everyone’s fatherless offspring can be raised by the same uninspired bureaucrats in the same grey-walled, concrete and plate-glass buildings.

Consider:

- Feminists tend to be some combination of fat, old, ugly, abrasive, and slutty.

- Feminists want to convince men that we should be attracted to fat, old, ugly, abrasive sluts.

- Feminists want to convince women that it is OK for them to be fat, old, ugly, abrasive sluts. They want desirable women to become fat, old, ugly, abrasive sluts, so that the feminists no longer look so bad in comparison.

- Related to (1) and (2), Feminists want to convince men and women that it is immoral for men to not be attracted to fat, old, ugly, abrasive sluts.

This is why Feminism is working so passionately to ruin American women. Cui bono from the widespread adoption of feminist beliefs that destroy our once-slim, once-feminine, once-nurturing women? The answer, first and foremost, is the women who were already destroyed to begin with.

Feminists know that, in a monogamous world where everyone pairs up with an equally desirable mate, they could only ever earn the favour of weak, bottom-feeding men. Feminist ideology, i.e. the hysteric and childish whining about Patriarchy, Shaming Language, and Socially Constructed Gender Roles, is no more than the set of rationalizations with which they seek to drag the rest of womankind down to their level.

There’s the theory. Now let’s check out the data:

Exhibit A

(Here’s the full slideshow. Or, just head out to a slutwalk near you next year and see the carnage for yourself.)

And what of male feminists?

Some male feminists are just harem-amassing alphas in disguise, happy to make use of a belief system which is quite useful at talking girls out of their panties. Your author is always willing to inject a few morsels of non-judgemental sex-positive pap into a seduction to grease the wheels. But I’m a sociopath and a liar. The typical man finds it easier simply to internalize the adaptive beliefs, as we see in case of the egregious Hugo Shwyzer.

There are also many sincere ‘male’ feminists, or at least feminists that some doctors might, on the basis of extensive genetic testing, and in a purely technical and pedantic sense, refer to as ‘men.’

These are the boot-licking Mangina Omega. They are dying of thirst in a sexual desert, desperately trying to slake their thirst by chewing on a pile of wet sand.

Ugly, cranky feminists are at the absolute bottom of the sexual desirability (hierarchy trigger alert!) totem pole. But that still puts them out of reach to a large number of men. Some of these men are so desperate, so weak, so lacking in principle, and so unable or unwilling to constructively improve their lives, that they adopt a strategy of complete and utter subservience to the Hamsterarchy, in the hopes that they’ll beg off some morsel of terrible sex from some swamp donkey of a feminist.

Does this strategy ever work? Perhaps occasionally.

But I wonder how many blog groupies David Futrelle has. David, care to weigh in? For the sake of your pride, feel free to give your ‘tally’ in raw tonnage. I suggest comparing notes with fellow traveler in fat acceptance Nigel. A friendly wager, perhaps! But I digress, and this post is long enough for today.

Dear reader, I challenge you to find me a feminist who does not look like Jabba The Hut after his face caught fire and someone had to put it out with a wet chain. I challenge you to find me a slutwalk that is in any way distinguishable from a zombie parade in miniskirts. I challenge you to find me a This Is What A Feminist Looks Like t-shirt free of giant FUPA stretch marks and rancid butter-sweat armpit stains.

Failing that, please join me in celebrating a new holiday: The First Annual Ugly Feminist Awareness Week

Go forth and find ye some pictures and biographies of the most hilariously undateable, unloveable, untouchable feminists out there, and post links to them in the comments. Fellow bloggers, please join me in observing this joyous occasion. The rules are simple: There are no rules. Surprise me, surprise your readers, maybe even surprise yourself. Have some fun with it.

Make a feminist cry today.

(Cross-posted to In Mala Fide.)

{ 21 comments… read them below or add one }

Jennifer Fox March 26, 2013 at 4:01 pm

Are you shitting me? This article should be on the Onion.

Female oppression is a real thing, as much as men would like to deny it (which, by the way is very easy if you have never had to experience it.. just like racism. Who would’ve thought!). It breaks my heart to see these kinds of reactions to the beautiful uprising of women who have decided that enough bullshit is enough. So what is your response to their valid arguments? Reducing these women to “ugly” or “slutty” devalues them as human beings and glosses over their intelligent points. Who fucking cares if feminists look like Marilyn Monroe or not?! The fact that you care about their looks only serves to reaffirm the necessity of feminism: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and what these women look like does NOT matter. Would you ever say that a man was “ugly” and that was the reason why he didn’t get a particular job or use it as an excuse to devalue his words? Let me answer that for everyone: No, never. A man would not get the job because he was unqualified, but women are supposed to not only be hyperintelligent and overly qualified but smokin’ hot, also? Dude, get the fuck out of your rabbit hole and join the real world.

But thank you for reaffirming in my mind that there is still a fight to be had.

Andrew April 2, 2013 at 2:04 pm

You fucktard !! First off get your facts correct! Feminism bullcrap has only led to differences between men and women! And talking of female oppression, it still happens depsite all this feminism shit! And your double standard feminists won’t take a second to change their views if it suits their convenience! Look At Andrea Dworkin she married a billionaire when she had to, and she was the one provoking women against marriage!! Idiots of the highest order!Inthe Next slutwalk feminists like jennifer fox should greeted with rotton tomatoes and eggs!! ;)

Wow February 9, 2013 at 6:41 pm

I bet a bunch of people into this site are rapists and wife abusers.

Andrew April 2, 2013 at 1:59 pm

No you idiot!! I bet a bunch of feminists when you do not get proper attention, cry “rape” and physical abuse just to get some male attention!!!

Spoos in August December 21, 2012 at 11:14 am

^That has to be a troll.

Or, otherwise, the prosecution rests?

Annemarie Rose Weissberg aka Femminist Fatale December 20, 2012 at 3:35 pm

What the hell?

First of all, you are clearly a misogynist, so that invalidates any points you might try to make here. Maybe you think real women are ugly, but that is subjective — I think you are ugly!

And what does this have to do with Marxism? You’re an idiot!

The Private Man December 21, 2012 at 11:38 am

Troll blog. It’s a bit over the top for decent satire.

whorefinder December 16, 2012 at 10:11 am

Actually, it was Perseus who slew Medusa, not Hercules. But spot on post, nonethess.

Big Ern November 18, 2012 at 8:53 pm

Seems the Japanese have independently stumbled onto the same conclusion:

Even more blunt in the Time piece was Minoru Nakamura, a popular assemblyman, who noted, “Pitiable women who direct their dissatisfaction at being ignored by men toward society … are truly laughable. Not yet finished, he added: “It’s also strange how these women, compared to their peers, are uglier.”

Read more: http://digitaljournal.com/article/315234#ixzz2Cd4LIyET

Cam November 14, 2012 at 7:56 am

Haha nerdypants – You’ve got some pretty low standards mate.

nerdypants November 4, 2012 at 8:57 pm

“Here’s the full slideshow … I challenge you to find me a feminist who does not look like Jabba The Hut”

That’s really odd. The very first photograph in the slideshow you linked to shows a young woman with a hula-hoop who is mainstream-beautiful by anyone’s reckoning.

Derrick September 20, 2012 at 2:43 pm

Feminism was a component of Marxism from Marx himself. Marx did not work, his wife supported him.

GorgeousFeminist June 13, 2012 at 3:05 pm

Pretty feminists you say? That was easy! http://femen.org/

Feminism=shit test September 2, 2012 at 8:45 pm

Wow we have to go to the other side of the world where feminist ideals have not been implemented to find hot feminists? What do you suppose the odds are the women are hot, but abrasive, annoying, slutty? Stay strong Putin! Here is a fascinating video a russian friend sent to me. Judge for yourself how far feminism has been implemented in russia. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNa7tNFB7c4&list=FLxmnJIXr0fyNeR_XIwTva_w&index=6&feature=plpp_video

Senior Beta June 6, 2012 at 4:09 pm

I don’t know which one is more epic. This one or the previous tale of the final breakup with the sweet girlfriend. Both are now in the Roissy/Roosh hall of fame. Good luck. From today’s posts, my only advice would be to check out Poland.

Frost June 9, 2012 at 11:33 am

Thanks! Bang Poland definitely gave me a hunger to check out the country…

Breeze June 5, 2012 at 5:07 am

Just as alpha’s use feminism to their advantage so do some women. Jane Fonda was a hot feminist but I bet you gobbled arsehole’s cocks for fun.
Actually, that leads me to another point- feminism is a shit test. Any feminist will suck the cock of a man is his is enough of an alpha bastard. E.g. Betty Friedan got on her knees for Henry Kissinger. The moral being that when dealing with feminist being an unapologetic and unflinching alpha who calls them on their shit wets their pannties. So the next time you want to bang some feminist leaning chick, instead of selling out your integrity for a hairy pussy, treat it as a shit test and challenge and sac up and be the complete badass womaniser who this women will be ashamed to admit drilled her but secretly fingers herself asleep to your memory. And if the pick up goes south you get to make a feminist cry.

Arch June 4, 2012 at 10:03 pm

Google image search: “fatkini”

Frost June 9, 2012 at 11:57 am

shudder

nigelbiggame June 4, 2012 at 11:38 am

“- Feminists want to convince men that we should be attracted to fat, old, ugly, abrasive sluts.

- Feminists want to convince women that it is OK for them to be fat, old, ugly, abrasive sluts. They want desirable women to become fat, old, ugly, abrasive sluts, so that the feminists no longer look so bad in comparison.”

That’s what I love about feminism. These bitches are getting thick. Hell, I’m a feminist. Girl power all the way! Trust me, she’s going to need that power when she is choking on my chocolate yard stick.

nigelbiggame June 4, 2012 at 11:35 am

Thanks for the shout out brother.

I’m curious, you say these feminists are ugly, but I was digging some of the rolls on the chicks in the slut walk picture. Donuts need to be glazed.

{ 9 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: